Fork (chess)
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
In chess, a fork is a tactic in which a piece attacks multiple enemy pieces simultaneously. The attacker usually aims to capture one of the forked pieces. The defender often cannot counter every threat. A fork is most effective when it is forcing, such as when the king is put in check. A fork is a type of double attack.
Terminology
[edit]A fork is an example of a double attack. The type of fork is named after the type of forking piece. For example, a fork by a knight is a knight fork. The attacked pieces are forked.[1] If the king is one of the attacked pieces, the term absolute fork is sometimes used, while a fork not involving the enemy king is a relative fork.[2]
A fork of the king and queen, the highest material-gaining fork possible, is sometimes called a royal fork. A fork of the enemy king, queen, and one (or both) rooks is sometimes called a grand fork. A knight fork of the enemy king, queen, and possibly other pieces is sometimes called a family fork or family check.[3][4]
Strategy
[edit]Any piece can deliver a fork. Forks are most often delivered by knights: a knight is not attacked by a piece it attacks except for an enemy knight, and it can be exchanged for a more valuable piece.[5][6]
Compared to forks by other pieces, a queen fork requires more specific conditions to be helpful due to the queen's higher value. However, a queen fork can often lead to material or positional gain when the forked pieces are undefended, poorly coordinated, or when one piece is the king.[citation needed]
Game examples
[edit]a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
This example is from the first round of the FIDE World Chess Championship 2004 between Mohamed Tissir and Alexey Dreev.[7] After
- 33... Nf2+ 34. Kg1 Nd3
White resigned. In the final position the black knight forks White's queen and rook; after the queen moves away, Black will win the exchange.
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
This example is from the ninth round of the Clarin GP Final between Guillermo Soppe and Fernando Braga.[8] After
- 40... Qh1+
White resigned. The only move is 41.Ke2 which enables a royal fork with 41...Nc3+, winning the queen.
|
|
In the Two Knights Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6) after 4.Nc3, Black can eliminate White's e4-pawn immediately with
- 4... Nxe4!
due to the fork trick
- 5. Nxe4 d5
regaining either the bishop or the knight.
References
[edit]- ^ "The Fork • lichess.org". lichess.org. Retrieved 2021-04-09.
- ^ "Chess Game Strategies - Next Chess Move". Chess Game Strategies.
- ^ Polgar, S.; Truong, P. (2015). A World Champion's Guide to Chess: Step-by-Step Instructions for Winning Chess the Polgar Way!. Russell Enterprises, Incorporated. p. cxix. ISBN 978-1-941270-33-2. Retrieved 2024-11-12.
Here White can give a "family fork" by attacking three black pieces at once: king, queen, and rook, with 1.Nf4+.
- ^ Hooper, David; Whyld, Kenneth (1996) [1992]. The Oxford Companion to Chess (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 132 at family check. ISBN 0-19-280049-3.
- ^ "Fork in Chess - Chess Terms". Chess.com. Retrieved 2021-04-09.
- ^ Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 143, fork
- ^ "Tissir vs. Dreev, Tripoli 2004". Chessgames.com.
- ^ "Guillermo Soppe vs. Fernando Braga, (1998)". Chessgames.com.