Jump to content

Talk:Taiwan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 December 2024

[edit]

For Section "Government and Politics" in particular

“as defined in the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area.”

Suggestion: Might add a link to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-Strait_Act here. Yyx0725 (talk) 18:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Added and thank you for the suggestion! The AP (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 December 2024

[edit]
Chanhui12345* (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan's most famous dish is called "LuRouFan" (added to the introduction for Taiwan's food and what it is popular for ) because i think it very important for visitor to know about Taiwan, and what Taiwan is famous of, and famous food

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. CMD (talk) 02:18, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 January 2025

[edit]

Under Health section, at the very end, to better compare Taiwan's healthcare system standing to others in the world, we should add:


add----

Taiwan's healthcare system is among the best in the world. It has consistently ranked first for six consecutive years in the Health Care Index published by CEOWORLD magazine. Combining quality healthcare, affordability, and convenience, Taiwan is an increasingly popular destination for medical tourism.

Sources: [1] https://ceoworld.biz/2024/04/02/countries-with-the-best-health-care-systems-2024/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan#Health


end-------- Hsienwenk (talk) 08:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MIght be usdue, as this is only one ranking. Slatersteven (talk) 12:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly controversial short description

[edit]

In WP:SDNOTDEF: It should use universally accepted facts that will not be subject to rapid change, avoiding anything that could be (not is) understood as controversial, judgemental, or promotional.

In para 4 we say: The political status of Taiwan is contentious.

I think we should use less controversial/contentious words to describe it. 36.230.3.161 (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No actual reason other than legalism to do this only in the short description, and we've very firmly established that we refer to Taiwan as a country. Apologies to the thin end of yet another wedge here. Remsense ‥  21:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No actual reason - how?
Word "contentious" is the best evidence. 36.230.3.161 (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what the short description is for; it is a navigational aid, not a rigorous definition. We refer to Taiwan as a country throughout the article, and this is no different. Remsense ‥  06:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should introduce the dispute into the lede sentence, as it's so contentious.
I see a comment in WP:TWRFC and it seems it was ignored. 36.230.3.161 (talk) 06:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The lead as written presents the issues at hand in a proportionate manner. That suggestion was (in my opinion) totally unviable. We present all sides of an issue proportionally, but we do not assume some "neutral" position of our own invention via qualifying any contested statement of fact whatsoever. The majority position is that Taiwan is a country; we assume that position while giving the others their due. It is in any case immaterial, as the community consensus is clear. Cheers. Remsense ‥  06:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]